96 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff
96 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff
From 30fdfb90d9864bcc254a62760aaa149d373fd4eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
|
|
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:38:23 +0100
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] Second blank check with root for non-existent users must
|
|
never return 1
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|
|
|
|
The commit af0faf66 ("pam_unix: avoid determining if user exists") introduced
|
|
a regression where the blank check could return 1 if root had an empty
|
|
password hash because in the second case the password hash of root was
|
|
used. We now always return 0 in this case.
|
|
|
|
The issue was found by Johannes Löthberg.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #284
|
|
|
|
* modules/pam_unix/support.c (_unix_blankpasswd): Make the loop
|
|
to cover the complete blank check so both existing and non existing
|
|
cases are identical except for the possible return value.
|
|
---
|
|
modules/pam_unix/support.c | 39 +++++++++++++-------------------------
|
|
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/modules/pam_unix/support.c b/modules/pam_unix/support.c
|
|
index d669e951..27ca7127 100644
|
|
--- a/modules/pam_unix/support.c
|
|
+++ b/modules/pam_unix/support.c
|
|
@@ -601,8 +601,9 @@ _unix_blankpasswd (pam_handle_t *pamh, unsigned long long ctrl, const char *name
|
|
char *salt = NULL;
|
|
int daysleft;
|
|
int retval;
|
|
- int execloop = 1;
|
|
- int nonexistent = 1;
|
|
+ int blank = 0;
|
|
+ int execloop;
|
|
+ int nonexistent_check = 1;
|
|
|
|
D(("called"));
|
|
|
|
@@ -632,43 +633,29 @@ _unix_blankpasswd (pam_handle_t *pamh, unsigned long long ctrl, const char *name
|
|
* are equal, making it more difficult to differentiate existing from
|
|
* non-existing users.
|
|
*/
|
|
- while (execloop) {
|
|
+ for (execloop = 0; execloop < 2; ++execloop) {
|
|
retval = get_pwd_hash(pamh, name, &pwd, &salt);
|
|
|
|
if (retval == PAM_UNIX_RUN_HELPER) {
|
|
- execloop = 0;
|
|
- if(nonexistent) {
|
|
- get_pwd_hash(pamh, "pam_unix_non_existent:", &pwd, &salt);
|
|
- }
|
|
- /* salt will not be set here so we can return immediately */
|
|
if (_unix_run_helper_binary(pamh, NULL, ctrl, name) == PAM_SUCCESS)
|
|
- return 1;
|
|
- else
|
|
- return 0;
|
|
+ blank = nonexistent_check;
|
|
} else if (retval == PAM_USER_UNKNOWN) {
|
|
name = "root";
|
|
- nonexistent = 0;
|
|
- } else {
|
|
- execloop = 0;
|
|
+ nonexistent_check = 0;
|
|
+ continue;
|
|
+ } else if (salt != NULL) {
|
|
+ if (strlen(salt) == 0)
|
|
+ blank = nonexistent_check;
|
|
}
|
|
- }
|
|
-
|
|
- /* Does this user have a password? */
|
|
- if (salt == NULL) {
|
|
- retval = 0;
|
|
- } else {
|
|
- if (strlen(salt) == 0)
|
|
- retval = 1;
|
|
- else
|
|
- retval = 0;
|
|
+ name = "pam_unix_non_existent:";
|
|
+ /* non-existent user check will not affect the blank value */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* tidy up */
|
|
-
|
|
if (salt)
|
|
_pam_delete(salt);
|
|
|
|
- return retval;
|
|
+ return blank;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int _unix_verify_password(pam_handle_t * pamh, const char *name
|