Files
main/kernel/drivers/module-linux-apfs-rw/files/rw-by-default.patch
T

56 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff

From e9dfb693ab15084c38805631a90730bc8c22dd37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bahar Kurt <kurtbahartr@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:07:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Enable the experimental write support by default
It looks safe enough for daily usage.
---
super.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super.c b/super.c
index 5fc2b2b..a07be9a 100644
--- a/super.c
+++ b/super.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,9 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options)
/* Set default values before parsing */
nx_flags = 0;
+ /* DOWNSTREAM: Set r/w to be the default. It looks safe and sane enough to me. - Bedirhan */
+ nx_flags |= APFS_READWRITE;
+
if (!options)
goto out;
@@ -1196,10 +1199,13 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options)
switch (token) {
case Opt_readwrite:
/*
- * Write support is not safe yet, so keep it disabled
- * unless the user requests it explicitly.
+ * Write support is not safe yet, and it was disabled upstream,
+ * but it looks safe and usable enough for data recovery and
+ * little operations like fixing corrupted files.
*/
- nx_flags |= APFS_READWRITE;
+ //nx_flags |= APFS_READWRITE;
+ apfs_warn(sb, "no need to explicitly state r/w mounts");
+ apfs_notice(sb, "we have already made it the default for you downstream");
break;
case Opt_cknodes:
/*
@@ -1242,9 +1248,9 @@ out:
if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY)) {
if (nxi->nx_flags & APFS_READWRITE) {
apfs_notice(sb, "experimental write support is enabled");
+ apfs_notice(sb, "this is default only downstream, and you should blame the packager for loss of written data, not the upstream");
} else {
apfs_warn(sb, "experimental writes disabled to avoid data loss");
- apfs_warn(sb, "if you really want them, check the README");
sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY;
}
}
--
2.46.2