* make the search for rev. deps more readable by flipping an if else
This commit is contained in:
+5
-6
@@ -454,19 +454,18 @@ def plan_upgrade(A, ignore_build = False):
|
||||
for dep in pkg.runtimeDependencies():
|
||||
# add packages that can be upgraded
|
||||
if dependency.repo_satisfies_dep(dep):
|
||||
#TODO: distinguish must upgrade and upgradable
|
||||
if ctx.installdb.is_installed(dep.package):
|
||||
if not ctx.get_option('eager'):
|
||||
if dependency.installed_satisfies_dep(dep):
|
||||
if ctx.get_option('eager'):
|
||||
if not upgradable(dep):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if not upgradable(dep):
|
||||
if dependency.installed_satisfies_dep(dep):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if not dep.package in G_f.vertices():
|
||||
Bp.add(str(dep.package))
|
||||
G_f.add_dep(x, dep)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise Error(_("Reverse dependency %s cannot be satisfied") % rev_dep)
|
||||
raise Error(_('Dependency %s cannot be satisfied') % rev_dep)
|
||||
B = Bp
|
||||
# now, search reverse dependencies to see if anything
|
||||
# should be upgraded
|
||||
@@ -482,7 +481,7 @@ def plan_upgrade(A, ignore_build = False):
|
||||
if packagedb.has_package(rev_dep) and \
|
||||
(not dependency.installed_satisfies_dep(depinfo)):
|
||||
if not dependency.repo_satisfies_dep(depinfo):
|
||||
raise Error(_("Reverse dependency %s cannot be satisfied") % rev_dep)
|
||||
raise Error(_('Reverse dependency %s cannot be satisfied') % rev_dep)
|
||||
if not rev_dep in G_f.vertices():
|
||||
Bp.add(rev_dep)
|
||||
G_f.add_plain_dep(rev_dep, x)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user